Helmet-less cyclists must share blame for injuries, rules judge
A High Court judge has ruled that cyclists are partly to blame for their injuries if they fail to wear a helmet, even if the accident was not their fault (Times Online).
The ruling, which has caused consternation in the cycling world, could see damages for injuries cut by 15%. Critics believe it could be a backdoor means of forcing cyclists to wear helmets.
The judge ruled on a case brought by Robert Smith, who was riding in Brightlingsea, Essex, in 2005 when a motorcycle collided with his bicycle. As a consequence, Mr Smith sustained a serious brain injury.
He had not been wearing a cycle helmet and Mr Justice Griffith Williams ruled: “There can be no doubt that the failure to wear a helmet may expose the cyclist to risk of greater injury…any injury sustained may be the cyclist’s own fault.”
Click here to read the full Times Online news report.
20mph limits Academy news Autonomous vehicles Children Cyclists Drink driving Driver distraction Driver tiredness Driver training Driving at work Driving conditions Drug driving Engineering Enforcement Events Fit to drive General news In-car safety Mobile phones Motorcyclists News in brief Older drivers Pedestrians Public Health Research & evaluation RSGB news SCPs Speed Statistics & data Teenagers Vehicles & Technology Young drivers